Friday, October 20, 2006

This Is What the Media Cares About?

Tara and I were working downstairs with the TV on in the background when we saw a familiar face flash across the screen. Thank God for TiVo, or we'd have missed this entirely.

Channel 6 in Albany teased tonight's newscast with the "Dion's changing his name to Kennedy" story that Jack Dew of the Eagle had published last week. And they did it with that grating little vocal smirk that news anchors are really good at--the same one that they use to tell stories that end with "Fortunately, no one was injured."

This is probably the only non-local access TV coverage the Berkshire, Hampshire, and Franklin state senate race is going to get apart from the micro-scroll across the bottom of the screen on the Boston stations come Nov. 7th. Is our seat that pointless that the only time anyone even notices is during the publicity stunts? Should I even be glad that they even pay attention to THOSE?

Perspective is everything when it comes to a lot of things, and politics isn't usually one of those things. But say for a second we tried to apply some perspective to this situation. There are forty senators in the General Court, and our conservative administration would like nothing better than to see control of major issues stripped from [Clinton-era liberal activist] federal judges right back to the states (except for equal marriage, for which they want to amend the Constitution, but that's another post entirely). This means that if the federal government washes its hands of some very pressing cultural and political legislation, the determination of how we live our lives here could very well be placed in the hands of forty senators--one for each 153,000 residents. The rights we have regarding abortion, flag burning, gambling, gun ownership, marriage, civil rights, telecommunications--all hot-button issues currently in federal stewardship--could rest on the shoulders of a bunch of people in Boston who get virtually no non-biased press before they go off to vote on what we can or can't do without getting thrown in jail.

Does it seem unimportant now?

This election is getting less coverage in both Boston and Albany than, for instance, Deion Branch signing with the Seahawks. Not just at this level, either. The only serious coverage the Governor's race is getting concerns the negative media advertising. You couldn't even watch a lot of the Governor's debates in Berkshire County! EVEN on local access!

It's a common trick for politicians to blame the media for personal shortcomings. But the media is doing such a terrible job keeping the public informed and involved that it's just shameful. It wouldn't even be so bad if they just ignored the entire thing completely, so long as they didn't just focus on the non-issues that confuse and cloud the real importance of the process.

And there's no solution in sight apart from getting involved personally. And that goes to hell as soon as the new fall episodes of the TV shows start up. No excuse now, though--another reason to thank God for TiVo.

2 Comments:

At Sat Oct 21, 09:36:00 AM EDT, Blogger John said...

Television news is a big waste of time in general, local news more so . . . especially when it comes from one of those dreadful Albany stations.

The real crime is NPR in this area. Dominated by AMC, the Berkshires has to share its coverage with half of New York State, Southern Vermont, and even Pennsylvania . . . all filtered through Alan Chartock. Good god . . .

 
At Sat Oct 21, 11:52:00 AM EDT, Blogger Ross said...

Hi John.

You raise a good point. What about WNAW? They haven't really done much apart from accept the candidate ad buys. Is there a local politics call-in show, or are we stuck with local access cable there?

But I do want to give lukewarm praise to the print media. At least the Transcript and the Eagle publish (softball) candidate profiles, cover the debates (a picture and 4 column inches), publish the letters, make the endorsements, and break campaign-related stories. It was Dew's article about CEO-gate that paved the way for what will become Ben Downing's long political career, for instance.

Let's watch what Mr. Drohan does throughout an entire election cycle and reconvene the jury then. On the other hand, the '08 elections promise to be pretty quiet locally; it's unlikely Reps Olver or Bosley, Senator Downing (probably), or Mayor Barrett will be opposed seriously.

But back East I used to get a really handy packet around this time of year from the Massachusetts League of Women Voters. Covered the candidates, the ballot questions, voting procedures, all that stuff that people need to help make decisions. And it came free in the mailbox--so the seniors or other folks who don't subscribe to the paper or read it online would have something to go by. Where is that? Did I get one and not see it, or did I not get one yet--or will I not get one at all?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home